vyslechnout kontradiktorně // kontradiktorní výslech

English translation: contradictory examination

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
Czech term or phrase:kontradiktorní výslech
English translation:contradictory examination
Entered by: LenkaH

14:32 Aug 13, 2011
Czech to English translations [PRO]
Law/Patents - Law (general) / criminal court proceedings
Czech term or phrase: vyslechnout kontradiktorně // kontradiktorní výslech
svědek nebyl nikdy vyslechnut kontradiktorně, což je jedním z minimálních práv, která má každý, kdo je obviněn z trestného činu (srov. čl. 6 odst. 3 písm. d) Úmluvy o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobod).

Dobrý den, hledám anglický ekvivalent výrazu "kontradiktorní výslech" ve výše uvedeném kontextu.
Prozatím mám tyto možnosti: adversary/adversarial examination...inter partes examination.
Pořád se mi nedaří dohledat, jestli by staré známé "cross-examination" bylo ono...
Předem děkuju za návrhy příp. zdroje.
Lenka
LenkaH
Local time: 03:09
examine contradictory / contradictory examination
Explanation:
"Kontradiktornost, slovo pocházející z latiny (contra dicere = mluvit proti, oponovat) v obecné rovině znamená vyjevováních sporných skutečností cestou polemiky, sporu. Vše v občanském procesním právu musí být podrobeno debatě účastníků, kteří mají právo vyjádřit se ke všem skutečnostem a ke všem důkazům, to se týká i nesporného řízení. Jako jeden ze základních právních principů je třeba připustit kontradiktornost v každém řízení, bez ohledu na jeho povahu."
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontradiktornost_(právo)
z linku Hannah:
"d. to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;"
Selected response from:

jankaisler
Local time: 03:09
Grading comment
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
3 +1cross-examine
Rad Graban (X)
3 +1examine contradictory / contradictory examination
jankaisler
4the witness was never confronted
Hannah Geiger (X)
3contradictory hearing
Maria Chmelarova
3confront and cross-examine
Yvetteb (X)


Discussion entries: 8





  

Answers


2 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
contradictory hearing


Explanation:
zneje to celkom cesko-anglicky...

Maria Chmelarova
Local time: 21:09
Native speaker of: Slovak
PRO pts in category: 7
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)
The asker has declined this answer

3 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
cross-examine


Explanation:
"The right to cross examine prosecution witnesses; and the right to call witnesses for the defence: Article 6(3)(d);"


    Reference: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/human_rights_and_criminal...
Rad Graban (X)
United Kingdom
Local time: 02:09
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in SlovakSlovak
PRO pts in category: 20

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Charles Stanford
40 mins

agree  janavio: ve smyslu daného kontextu: právo obviněného vyslechnout svědka, kterého předvolala druhá strana; avšak nepoužilo by se v případě práva obviněného dosáhnout předvolání a výslech svědků ve svůj prospěch za stejných podmínek, jako svědků proti sobě
16 hrs

neutral  jankaisler: nejde o křížový výslech - za účelem zviklání věrohodnosti svědka
18 hrs

neutral  Peter Hladky: I think that contradictory examination is different than cross-examination. Question was other than your answer.
21 hrs

disagree  Maria Chmelarova: .........to je krizovy vyslech
21 hrs
  -> Mária, máš nejakú definíciu "kontradiktórneho výsluchu"?
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)
The asker has declined this answer

22 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
examine contradictory / contradictory examination


Explanation:
"Kontradiktornost, slovo pocházející z latiny (contra dicere = mluvit proti, oponovat) v obecné rovině znamená vyjevováních sporných skutečností cestou polemiky, sporu. Vše v občanském procesním právu musí být podrobeno debatě účastníků, kteří mají právo vyjádřit se ke všem skutečnostem a ke všem důkazům, to se týká i nesporného řízení. Jako jeden ze základních právních principů je třeba připustit kontradiktornost v každém řízení, bez ohledu na jeho povahu."
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontradiktornost_(právo)
z linku Hannah:
"d. to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;"


    Reference: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontradiktornost_(pr%C3%A1vo)
jankaisler
Local time: 03:09
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Czech
PRO pts in category: 168

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Peter Hladky: Tiež si myslím, že krížový výsluch je niečo iné ako kontradiktórny.
2 hrs
  -> Dík Peter!

neutral  Maria Chmelarova: Jan...,osobne mam len jeden problem, inak by som s vami suhlasila. Rozdiel medzi examination-vysetrovanie a hearing-vypocuvanie.
2 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
the witness was never confronted


Explanation:
the right to confront witnesses
http://www.humanrights.coe.int/aware/GB/publi/materials/1062...
Úmluva o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobod
Čl.6
Právo na spravedlivý proces


d) vyslýchat nebo dát vyslýchat svědky proti sobě a dosáhnout předvolání a výslech svědků ve svůj prospěch za stejných podmínek, jako svědků proti sobě;




Article 6 – Right to a fair trial
1. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
a. to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
b. to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
c. to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
d. to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
e. to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.


http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/005.htm


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2011-08-14 13:42:46 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The right to confront witnesses: Article 6(3)(d)
The wording and the case-law of Article 6(3)(d) support the principle of
equality of arms which underlies Article 6 in its entirety. For example, in the
case of Bönisch v. Austria (1985), the Court held that a trial court must follow
that same pattern of interrogation in examining its own expert witnesses and
those called by the defence. The right to call or confront witnesses is not an
unlimited right. Courts may determine the number of witnesses a party may
call or the necessity of hearing a particular witness in order to establish the
facts of the case or otherwise contribute to a fair adjudication (Perna v. Italy
(2003) (no violation of Article 6(1) and 6(3)(d) for not calling a witness whose
testimony would consist of a denial of allegations against him)). However, in
the event that a court refuses to admit evidence proposed by a party, it must
provide reasons for the refusal (Pisano v. Italy (2000) and Suominen v.
Finland (2003)).



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2011-08-14 13:43:52 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.humanrights.coe.int/aware/GB/publi/materials/1062...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2011-08-14 14:08:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

……the European Convention on Human Rights, which has been adopted by virtually all European countries, guarantees certain trial rights typical of the common law style, most importantly the defendant's right to present evidence in his defense and to confront witnesses against him (European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Basic Freedoms of Nov. 4, 1950, art. 6 sec. 3 lit. d).

………the presiding judge frequently confronts witnesses with prior statements contained in the dossier and asks them to explain contradictions between their trial testimony and what they had earlier told the police or the prosecutor

http://law.jrank.org/pages/901/Criminal-Procedure-Comparativ...


Hannah Geiger (X)
United States
Local time: 21:09
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in CzechCzech, Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 91

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
neutral  jankaisler: konfrontace a kontradiktornost jse dvě různé věci
23 hrs
  -> prominte, já s vámi zde nesouhlasím, nebot je to v českém originále tazatelky zprzněnina tím pádem mne vaše odkazy wikipedie vůbec nenadchly
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)
The asker has declined this answer

8 days   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
confront and cross-examine


Explanation:
the witness was never confronted and cross-examined

Yvetteb (X)
Local time: 20:09
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in SlovakSlovak
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)
The asker has declined this answer



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search