00:32 Nov 5, 2008 |
Danish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Defence plea | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Christine Andersen Denmark Local time: 07:44 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | the greater includes the lesser |
| ||
1 | jeg kender ikke oversættelsen p.t. |
| ||
1 | at the most, be at least found innocent (cleared) |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
EU document |
|
jeg kender ikke oversættelsen p.t. Explanation: ... det mindre indgribende altid er indeholdt i den mere indgribende foranstaltning/bevilling Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://polweb.nethotel.dk/Produkt/PolWeb/Sog/ShowFile.asp?p=... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
the greater includes the lesser Explanation: the greater includes the lesser -- ser ud til at være ret kontroversiel i den engelsksprogede verden, og forbindes mere med religion end jura, når man søger på nettet, men der er en diskussion her: http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/mberman/vandy-final.pdf ´on the principle that the greater includes the lesser...´ Det er det nærmeste, jeg kan komme i tanker om. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 12 hrs (2008-11-05 13:19:07 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Der er endnu et eksempel her: http://www.fdli.org/pubs/Journal Online/54_4/art4.pdf Often categorized as “intermediate First Amendment scrutiny,” this balancing test has the problem of providing the courts with enormous discretion. To illustrate, the Supreme Court used this test in Posadas de Puerto Rico5 to uphold a paternalistic restriction on casino advertising directed at anyone but tourists. The Court advanced the widely-criticized argument that “the greater power to completely ban casino gambling necessarily includes the lesser power to ban advertising of casino gambling.” Modern-day state legislatures arguably have the power to outlaw almost any product or service. Thus, if taken seriously, this notion that the “greater-includes-the-lesser” essentially would eliminate protection for commercial speech about any product or service other than those that are constitutionally protected, such as books and movies. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
at the most, be at least found innocent (cleared) Explanation: X ought (should), for the most, at least be found innocent (be cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as .......is concerned another way of putting it: X ought (should), at the most, be, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as......is concerned -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:57:18 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- rewriting the second suggested translation of your above term: X ought to be (should be), at the most, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as...... is concerned -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:59:57 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- a third and final option is: at the most, X ought/should be at least cleared of those charges brought before this court concerning............ |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
7 hrs |
Reference: EU document Reference information: This may help you. I'm adding the link here, since it doesn't seem to like it when it's posted in the web-reference field! http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&ihmlang=... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.