onderzoeksopdrachtgericht(e)

English translation: relevant to the authorised investigation

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
Dutch term or phrase:onderzoeksopdrachtgericht(e)
English translation:relevant to the authorised investigation
Entered by: Willemina Hagenauw

11:01 May 20, 2016
Dutch to English translations [PRO]
Law/Patents - Law (general) / intelligence and security
Dutch term or phrase: onderzoeksopdrachtgericht(e)
This is from an explanatory memorandum to an act on the intelligence and security services.
It discusses interception of telecommunication and refers to "onderzoeksopdrachtgerichte interceptie". I've found one website of a blogger who translates it as "investigation-bound interception" but I am not sure if this is correct. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Willemina Hagenauw
Local time: 06:22
relevant to the authorised investigation
Explanation:
To provide you with yet another option :-). As in: interception (of information/data) which is relevant to the authorised investigation. Or more generically: (...) relevant to an authorised investigation.

Furthermore, the SCA provides for access to metadata records, without judicial authorisation, where the Director of the FBI (or his designee) certifies that they are relevant to an authorised investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. Those requests are know  National Security Letters.
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2015/jun/uk-IPR-Report-five-e...

Under the Section 215 programme discussed herein, the FBI obtains orders from the FISC directing telecommunications service providers to provide telephony meta-data. The US explained that, generally, the application for an order from the FISC pursuant to Section 215 must specify reasonable grounds to believe that the records are relevant to an authorised investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a US person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. Under the telephony metadata collection programme, the NSA, in turn, stores and analyses these bulk records which can be queried only for counterterrorism purposes. The US explained that the information sought must be "relevant" to an investigation and that this is understood broadly, since a piece of information that might not be relevant at the time of acquisition could subsequently prove to be relevant for an investigation. The standard applied is less stringent than "probable cause" under criminal law and permits broad collection of data in order to allow the intelligence authorities to extract relevant information. https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/EU/XXV/EU/00/39/EU_03988/im...
Selected response from:

Kitty Brussaard
Netherlands
Local time: 07:22
Grading comment
Thanks to all who contributed!
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4investigation specific interception
Wiard Sterk
4interception within the scope of an investigation; interception in the context of an investigation
Michael Beijer
3 +1authorized investigation-based interception
Barend van Zadelhoff
4investigation (or surveillance) order-based interception
Ronald Matthyssen
3 +1relevant to the authorised investigation
Kitty Brussaard
3instruction to focus on investigative function
Terry Costin


Discussion entries: 26





  

Answers


23 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
investigation specific interception


Explanation:
Which works well too, in my view, and is a bit more concise.

Wiard Sterk
United Kingdom
Local time: 06:22
Native speaker of: Native in DutchDutch, Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 8

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
neutral  Michael Beijer: I'm not entirely sure this is strong enough, in the sense of pointing out that the interception in question is / must be justified by being part of an investigation. / on second thought, probably OK.
4 mins
  -> Specific not strong enough?
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

19 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
interception within the scope of an investigation; interception in the context of an investigation


Explanation:
(might work)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2016-05-20 11:22:52 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

oops, my answer obviously relates to the entire phrase: "onderzoeksopdrachtgerichte interceptie"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2016-05-20 12:19:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

other options:

interception within the scope of a specific investigation
interception in the context of a specific investigation

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs (2016-05-20 18:26:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

some more options:

interception within the context of directed surveillance
interception for the purpose of a specific investigation

Michael Beijer
United Kingdom
Local time: 06:22
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 189

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
neutral  Wiard Sterk: First of all, these are two answers, scope and context do not cover the same meaning. Second, I think the interception has a particular focus on the investigation, and is not just within its scope or context.
16 mins
  -> (1) "in the context of an investigation" + "within the scope of of an investigation" sound pretty darned similar to me. (2) don't understand yr statement "has a particular focus on the investigation". think it has to be justified + specific
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

16 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
onderzoeksopdrachtgerichte interceptie
authorized investigation-based interception


Explanation:
Volgens mij moet 'opdracht' in 'onderzoeksopdrachtgericht' ook worden verantwoord en eigenlijk met name.

'opdracht' moet worden verantwoord vanwege de vereiste toestemming.

Als een voorgenomen onderzoek is getoetst en goedgekeurd dan ligt ook meteen de reikwijdte vast.
Als het nodig is, zou heel Amsterdam, bijv., 'getapt' mogen worden en in een ander geval alleen een bepaalde wijk of een huizenblok.
Ik zou me dus niet blindstaren op de omvang van het onderzoek en dat als het belangrijkste criterium laten gelden.

'research-oriented interception', zoals in de links hieronder, lijkt me niet nauwkeurig genoeg

Waar is 'interception' trouwens anders voor bedoeld/op gericht etc. dan voor 'investigation' ?
Het zou een open deur zijn.

See for the idea of 'Authorized Investigation' for example:

Authorized Investigation: A Temperate Alternative to
Cyber Insecurity

http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?a...


De AIVD en MIVD mogen niet helemaal ongericht de kabel aftappen en dan maar zien wat ze vinden. Ze mogen wel aan ’onderzoeksopdrachtgerichte interceptie’ doen. Dat betekent dat ze alleen mogen binnenhalen wat voor het doel van het onderzoek van belang is. Als er bijvoorbeeld bekend is dat een terreurverdachte in de Schilderswijk zit, kan besloten worden dat alleen data uit die buurt worden binnengehaald en niet uit heel Den Haag.

Om te voorkomen dat de diensten mensen onnodig afluisteren, wordt voortaan elke inzet van speciale bevoegdheden vooraf getoetst. Dat geldt dus niet alleen voor de nieuwe bevoegdheden via de kabel, maar ook voor de bestaande, zoals het aftappen van telefoongesprekken of het inbreken in computers.

Toestemming

Als de diensten gewone burgers willen tappen, moeten ze volgens het kabinetsvoorstel vooraf toestemming hebben van de verantwoordelijke minister en van de ’toetsingscommissie inzetbevoegdheden’. Die nieuwe, onafhankelijke commissie krijgt rechterlijke bevoegdheden. Voor het tappen van advocaten en journalisten moeten de diensten toestemming krijgen van de rechtbank Den Haag. Ondanks maatschappelijke bezwaren wil het kabinet het afluisteren van advocaten en journalisten onder bepaalde omstandigheden dus wel toestaan, maar belooft het wel strengere voorwaarden.

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/25607703/__Kabinet_wil_ka...

Kennisgevingsnummer: 2016/188/NL (Nederland)
Datum van ontvangst: 21/04/2016
Einde van de status-quoperiode: 22/07/2016

Ontwerptekst: nl


Europese Commissie

Details van kennisgeving

Voorstel van wet houdende regels met betrekking tot de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten alsmede wijziging van enkele wetten (Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten 20..)

Een belangrijk onderdeel van het voorstel vormt de technologie-onafhankelijke formulering van de bevoegdheden van de diensten in het bijzonder op het vlak van onderzoek van communicatie. Daardoor wordt het mogelijk onderzoeksopdrachtgerichte interceptie van communicatie uit te voeren in het kabelgebonden domein. Voorts wordt voorzien in uitbreiding van de informatieverplichtingen (onder meer m.b.t. verkeersgegevens) tot alle aanbieders van communicatiediensten. De noodzaak daartoe is gelegen in het feit dat de bevoegdheden van de diensten om onderzoek te doen naar gekende en ongekende dreigingen in toenemende mate achterlopen bij de mogelijkheden die door de nieuwe ICT aan targets van de diensten geboden wordt om op een zodanige manier met elkaar te communiceren dat men buiten het blikveld van de diensten blijft. Dat is een onaanvaardbaar risico met het oog op de kerntaak van de diensten om de nationale veiligheid te borgen.

http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/tris/nl/search/?t...

European Commission

Notification Detail

Bill containing rules concerning the intelligence and security services and amending certain acts (Intelligence and Security Services Act 20..)


Notification Number: 2016/188/NL (Netherlands)
Date received: 21/04/2016
End of Standstill: 22/07/2016

Draft Text: nl

An important part of the proposal is the technology-independent formulation of the services' competences, particularly in the field of communications research. As a result, the research-oriented interception of communications can be conducted online. In addition, the information requirements (with regard to traffic data, among others) will be expanded to all providers of communications services. The need for this arises from the fact that the services' competences to investigate known and unknown threats increasingly lag behind the possibilities that new information technology offers to targets in order to communicate with each other in such a way that they remain undetectable to the services. Given that the core task of the services is to ensure national security, this is an unacceptable risk.

http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/tris/en/search/?t...



Barend van Zadelhoff
Netherlands
Local time: 07:22
Native speaker of: Native in DutchDutch
PRO pts in category: 23

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Kitty Brussaard: I give you an agree for introducing the term 'authorised investigation' to cover the meaning of 'onderzoeksopdracht'. However, for the sake of readability/intelligibility, I would personally avoid using a complex compound of this type and rephrase things.
12 hrs
  -> Yes, I see this is your opinion. I thought 'based' for 'gericht' was a nice solution as well. Furthermore, the 'authorized investigation' part is key to the actual interception --> based. Thank you.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

20 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
investigation (or surveillance) order-based interception


Explanation:
I agree that "opdracht" needs to be accounted for. opdracht in legal contexts is order. The interception follows the order (gericht, so it is based on the way the order is phrased.

Ronald Matthyssen
Austria
Local time: 07:22
Native speaker of: Native in DutchDutch
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 day 1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): +1
relevant to the authorised investigation


Explanation:
To provide you with yet another option :-). As in: interception (of information/data) which is relevant to the authorised investigation. Or more generically: (...) relevant to an authorised investigation.

Furthermore, the SCA provides for access to metadata records, without judicial authorisation, where the Director of the FBI (or his designee) certifies that they are relevant to an authorised investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. Those requests are know  National Security Letters.
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2015/jun/uk-IPR-Report-five-e...

Under the Section 215 programme discussed herein, the FBI obtains orders from the FISC directing telecommunications service providers to provide telephony meta-data. The US explained that, generally, the application for an order from the FISC pursuant to Section 215 must specify reasonable grounds to believe that the records are relevant to an authorised investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a US person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. Under the telephony metadata collection programme, the NSA, in turn, stores and analyses these bulk records which can be queried only for counterterrorism purposes. The US explained that the information sought must be "relevant" to an investigation and that this is understood broadly, since a piece of information that might not be relevant at the time of acquisition could subsequently prove to be relevant for an investigation. The standard applied is less stringent than "probable cause" under criminal law and permits broad collection of data in order to allow the intelligence authorities to extract relevant information. https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/EU/XXV/EU/00/39/EU_03988/im...

Kitty Brussaard
Netherlands
Local time: 07:22
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in DutchDutch
PRO pts in category: 152
Grading comment
Thanks to all who contributed!

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Tina Vonhof (X): The best and shortest way to say it.//I agree, in general I don't like compounding more than two words.
1 hr
  -> Thanks, Tina. Compounding would probably be an even shorter way of saying it but IMO this would impact intelligibility/readability.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

4 days   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
instruction to focus on investigative function


Explanation:
As the Council is undoubtedly aware, in 1998 the European Parliament instructed STOA and a temporary committee of inquiry to investigate the Echelon interception system

Terry Costin
Netherlands
Local time: 07:22
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: English
PRO pts in category: 11
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search