Polite dissent 11:26 Jan 28, 2017
I'm at a loss to understand why Roland has decided this way. Alban proposed an answer, followed by an explanation which clearly shows that he does not know what covenant theology is. I then proposed a more accurate answer with (and this is important) documentation which shows why Alban’s explanation is false. Four other ProZ members agreed with Alban, yet none of them gave any reason why; when I posted my disagreement I summarized why, and referred to the explanation under my answer. But if their silence means that they consent to Alban’s explanation, that only goes to show that none of them knows what CT is either, and therefore the total value of their assertions is zero. Whereas, I have known what CT is for over 25 years, and therefore my answer carries more weight than that of five others who quite possibly have never even heard of CT before. Given their ignorance, they could/should have taken the initiative to take a brief look at the relevant Wiki entry, which would have prevented them from either stating or supporting Alban’s incorrect explanation.
This is not the first time I’ve seen that a KudoZ question has had a perverse outcome, and it puts me off contributing. |