GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
21:10 May 19, 2020 |
English to Dutch translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Finance (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Stieneke Hulshof Spain Local time: 21:48 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | een cascadestructuur van bedrijven |
| ||
2 +1 | tussengeschoven (dekmantel-)bedrijf |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
tussengeschoven (dekmantel-)bedrijf Explanation: To start the ball rolling cf. zwischengeschaltetes Unternehmen in DEU. Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://eng.proz.com/kudoz/english-to-dutch/finance-general/5... Reference: http://www.ibfd.org/IBFD-Products/Journal-Articles/Bulletin-... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
een cascadestructuur van bedrijven Explanation: Vertaling: "Houd er rekening mee dat de uiteindelijk begunstigde eigenaar verscholen kan zijn achter een casacadestructuur van bedrijven". Dit lijkt mij de juiste vertaling, zij het enigszins vrij. Met pogingen tot 'genest' of 'ingebed' bedrijf komen we volgens mij niet weg in de context, ik kom deze termen niet tegen in de organisatiestructuur. Het gaat om een organisatiestructuur waarbij het ene bedrijf een (meerderheidsbelang) heeft in het ene bedrijf, en dat bedrijf weer in een onderliggend bedrijf en zo verder. De bedrijven zijn sterk onderling verweven. Dit blijkt een 'cascadestructuur' te heten; zie voorbeelden. Google: Met weloverwogen lichtzinnigheid: de biografie van André Leysen -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2020-05-19 23:27:51 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Dit is het idee van de structuur van 'nested companies' en daar gaat het volgens mij hier ook over: "Term for a structure of nested holding companies An example would be a corporation A, that holds a controlling interest (say 51%) in company B, which holds a controlling interest (51% again) in company C, and now company A has a controlling interest in company C while only owning 25.5% of its stock." https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/280733/term-for-... Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://www.tijd.be/markten-live/nieuws/aandelen-brussel/rijk... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
1 hr |
Reference Reference information: Perhaps this helps a bit. 2. Even if the Definition Was Properly Amended, Not All Companies File with the IRS Even if the SS-4 Form did collect beneficial ownership information (which it does not as a rule), it would still be an inadequate solution. A company only files an SS-4 Form if they need an employee identification number (EIN). A company only needs an EIN if they will be paying taxes in the U.S., which they will only do if they have operations in the U.S. or open a bank account in the U.S. After many congressional hearings on the subject of money laundering and terror finance, Congress is aware that many companies are created in the U.S. and then used to operate abroad or simply used as one layer of ownership in a series of nested companies intended to cement the beneficial owner’s anonymity by exploiting this massive loophole in the U.S. system. This is one of the main problems that we are trying to combat, and the SS-4 Form does nothing to address this problem. https://thefactcoalition.org/briefing-memo-irs-does-not-coll... As a verb: to nest This was a big story at the time: But it was all a sham. Enron nested companies within companies and reported much of its balance sheet liabilities in those nested companies but not in its main entity. Why? Equity = Assets – Liabilities. By showing lower liabilities, Enron vastly inflated its reported net worth. That’s not all. Enron’s financial engineers not only contrived to lower liabilities, they used mark-to-market valuation to inflate the value of their assets. http://lukemarusiak.com/blog/category/all |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.