Diversity Cases
French translation: Causes relevant de la diversité, de compétence en matière de diversité
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12:41 May 16, 2020 |
| English to French translations [PRO] Law (general) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|  Selected response from: Germaine Canada Local time: 17:27 | ||||
Grading comment
| |||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 +2 | Causes relevant de la diversité, de compétence en matière de diversité |
| ||
| 4 -1 | [cas de] discrimination illégale |
|
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| La "diversité" dont on parle |
|
Answers
4 hrs confidence: 
peer agreement (net): -1
peer agreement (net): -1| diversity cases [cas de] discrimination illégale Explanation: That's what it is in actual fact. As not all forms of discrimination are illegal I think that "illégale" should be added. THAT would definitely be a criminal offence. Alternatively, you could always try some linguistic contortions / acrobatics just to stay close the original euphemism - I wouldn't. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
6 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +2
peer agreement (net): +2Causes relevant de la diversité, de compétence en matière de diversité Explanation: II. FONDEMENT DE LA COMPÉTENCE (marquez une seule case d’un « X ») 4 Diversité III. CITOYENNETÉ DES PARTIES PRINCIPALES (Causes relevant de la diversité seulement) VI. CAUSE D’ACTION Citez le droit civil des États-Unis en vertu duquel vous poursuivez (Ne citez pas les lois du for à moins [d’un cas] [d'une situation] de diversité) II. Compétence. (…) Diversité de citoyenneté. (4) Ceci renvoie aux poursuites [intentées] en vertu du 28 U.S.C., par. 1332, lorsque les parties sont citoyens d’états différents. Je tiens pour acquis qu’il s’agit du formulaire suivant : https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/js044.pdf où la « diversité » repose strictement sur la citoyenneté ou le lieu de résidence des parties, lesquels déterminent le tribunal compétent. (Le terme "diversité" ne vise pas la nature de la poursuite en soi, qui pourrait être une poursuite en discrimination comme en n'importe quoi d'autre.) …il existe deux moyens de soumettre une affaire à une juridiction fédérale aux Etats-Unis: par l'intermédiaire d'une «question fédérale», et en cas de «diversité»… c'est à dire où une compétence fédérale est invoquée du seul fait que les parties sont résidentes d'états différents… Les procédures en cas de diversité… les affaires de diversité… compétence en matière de diversité… https://assets.hcch.net/docs/287f1721-3c01-4085-a43c-26f8f56... un peu comme, aux Etats-Unis, la saisine des tribunaux fédéraux dans des situations de «diversity of citizenship» (diversité de résidence des plaideurs) https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/files/downloads/0/0/1/3/5/1... Diversité : le pouvoir de décider des cas entre les citoyens d'États différents https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_III_de_la_Constitution... |
| |||||||||
Grading comment
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
4 hrs |
| Reference: La "diversité" dont on parle Reference information: DIVERSITY CASES: are cases where the Plaintiff and Defendant are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000., exclusive of interest and costs. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a case in which a citizen of one State sues a citizen of another State or nation and the amount at stake is more than $75,000 is a diversity of citizenship case. In a diversity of citizenship case, no defendant may be a citizen of the same State as any plaintiff. http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/general/pdf/StepByStepEnglish.pd... In the law of the United States, diversity jurisdiction is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction in civil procedure in which a United States district court in the federal judiciary has the power to hear a civil case when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and where the persons that are parties are "diverse" in citizenship or state of incorporation (for corporations being legal persons), which generally indicates that they differ in state and/or nationality. Diversity jurisdiction and federal-question jurisdiction (jurisdiction over issues arising under federal law) constitute the two primary categories of subject matter jurisdiction in U.S. federal courts. The United States Constitution, in Article III, § 2, gives the Congress the power to permit federal courts to hear diversity cases through legislation authorizing such jurisdiction. The provision was included because the Framers of the Constitution were concerned that when a case is filed in one state, and it involves parties from that state and another state, the state court might be biased toward the party from that state.[1] Congress first exercised that power and granted federal trial circuit courts diversity jurisdiction in the Judiciary Act of 1789. Diversity jurisdiction is currently codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_jurisdiction |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations
Your current localization setting
English
Select a language
Close search