GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
15:32 Dec 29, 2016 |
English to German translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Government / Politics / Sozialversicherungen | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: gofink Austria Local time: 03:15 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Parking |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Hier wirds erklärt |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
Parking Explanation: Wie unten aufgeführt hat sich in diesem Bereich der Begriff Creaming für die Bevorzugung leicht vermittelbarer Arbeitsloser, ebenso wie Parking durchgesetzt: "Creaming & Parking": • tritt auf bei ergebnisabhängiger Vergütung (Deutschland: nur Vermittlungsgutscheine) • auch bei Differenzierung der Vergütung nach "Problemklassen" (da Dilemma zwischen Differenzierung und Anreiztransparenz nicht lösbar) - see http://www.interaktive-arbeit.de/files/knuth_et_al_vermarktl... Bei Beschäftigungsprojekten ist die Bevorzugung leicht vermittelbarer Arbeitsloser („Creaming") zu vermeiden, da schwer vermittelbare Personen ohne - see https://books.google.at/books?id=o-nMeJv_I7UC&pg=PA175&lpg=P... Das "sozialrechtlichen Dreiecksverhältnis" unter Bedingungen von NPM und Re-Kommodifizierung der Arbeitskraft - "Creaming & Parking": Optimierung der Relation von DLInput und zielkonformem Outcome - see http://www.interaktive-arbeit.de/files/knuth_et_al_vermarktl... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
27 mins |
Reference: Hier wirds erklärt Reference information: In the context of WTW interventions, ‘creaming’ refers to provider behaviour that prioritises attention for unemployed claimants with fewer barriers to work and who are therefore felt to be easier, cheaper and also more likely to move into paid work and release outcome payments. In contrast, ‘parking’ refers to provider behaviour that deliberately neglects giving time, energy or resources to unemployed claimants with more substantial barriers to work, given that such claimants are considered to be relatively unlikely to move into paid work and/or to require considerable, and usually expensive, employment support to make a move into paid work likely (and hence an outcome payment). the issue of the “parking” of hard-to-place WTW clients. Within the context of our analysis, parking is defined as not serving hard-to-place clients who have been assigned to WTW programs. In other words, parking might be characterized as a form of cream-skimming during the program, in which providers try to maximize placement rates and keep costs down by focusing resources on the most able clients while doing little to serve those with the poorest job prospects. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413869/ Reference: http://ftp.iza.org/dp4801.pdf |
| ||
Note to reference poster
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.