GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
06:55 Jun 24, 2000 |
English to German translations [PRO] Law/Patents | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Selected response from: Claudia Tomaschek Local time: 15:56 | |||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na | Überlegung or Beratung |
| ||
na | Please see below for an application of your terms. |
| ||
na | Rechtsbelehrung und Rechtsverzicht |
|
Überlegung or Beratung Explanation: Romain: - advisement = Überlegung, Beratung, Urteilsberatung - Urteilsberatung would not seem to fit your context at all. To "take something under advisement" means to think the something over, so Überlegung might fit but it does not sound like very good legalease, the Beratung could be from one's attorney, which might also make sense. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Please see below for an application of your terms. Explanation: Found via www.google.com Nos. 97SC678 & 96SC678. People v. Blehm; People v. Saint-Veltri. Criminal Procedure - Right to Testify - Trial Court Advisement - Waiver of Right - Appellate Review of Waiver - Search & Seizure - Exclusionary Rule - Good Faith Exception. The Supreme Court modifies the procedure for review of a waiver of the right to testify, holding that such review is best suited for post-conviction proceedings. Where the trial court advisement of the right to testify did not contain the elements identified in People v. Curtis, 681 P.2d 504 (Colo. 1984), the defendant is entitled to a post-conviction hearing to determine the validity of his waiver. Conversely, where the advisement was adequate, the record demonstrates that the defendant's waiver was valid, and he is not entitled to a post-conviction hearing. Furthermore, the Supreme Court reaffirms the Curtis holding that (1) a trial court must advise a defendant of his right to testify and the consequences of exercising that right, and (2) a waiver of the right must be knowing, voluntary and intelligent. In Blehm, the trial court's advisement contained all five essential Curtis elements. Thus, the defendant's waiver of the right to testify was effective, and he is not entitled to either a new trial or an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court reverses the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Blehm. In Saint-Veltri, the trial court's advisement was deficient because it failed to explain the impeachment consequence of testifying. According to the modified review procedure, the defendant is entitled to a post-conviction hearing. Thus, the Court of Appeals' judgment in Saint-Veltri is reversed as to this issue, and the case is remanded. The Supreme Court also holds that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule for clerical errors of court employees. Thus, evidence obtained in a search incident to an unlawful arrest need not be suppressed if the erroneous arrest was the result of court error and the police were not unreasonable in relying upon that error. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Rechtsbelehrung und Rechtsverzicht Explanation: "Advisement And Waiver Of Rights Re: Establishment Of Parental Relationship (Uniform Parentage) (1296-72) " ist der Titel eines Formulars, das sowohl Rechtsbelehrungen als auch die Verzichtserklärung bestimmter Rechte sowie Verpflichtungen enthält. Unter dem zweiten Link findest Du eine pdf-Version dieses Formulars. Es richtet sich an unterhaltspflichtige Elternr, die sich durch das Formular verpflichten, zum Zweck der Vereinbarung auf bestimmte Rechte verzichten (Recht auf Vaterschaftstest, Recht auf ein Verfahren, Recht auf Zeugenbefragung) und sich verpflichten, ihrer Unterhaltspflicht nachzukommen. Viele Grüße Claudia Reference: http://www.smithtodd.com/articles/admissions.htm Reference: http://web2.accesslaw.com/forms_famparen.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.