GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
18:40 Jan 20, 2014 |
English to Italian translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / UAMI - Commissioni di ricorso | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Daniela Zambrini Italy Local time: 20:42 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | conforme alla triade |
| ||
2 | successivo alla trilogia delle decisioni giurisprudenziali |
|
successivo alla trilogia delle decisioni giurisprudenziali Explanation: letteralmente credo che in questo caso specifico trilogy sia inteso in riferimento alla parabola giurisprudenziale nota agli addetti ai lavori come Trilogia Daubert-Joiner-Khumo sull'utilizzo delle prove scientifiche http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Daubert standa... e http://eprints.unife.it/674/1/Tesi.pdf vedi pag 314 del seguente link http://books.google.it/books?id=Y7EtB43AyuYC&pg=PA314&lpg=PA... se ho ben capito, l'autore si è occupato dell'ammissibilità delle prove scientifiche e delle perizie presentate in fase di dibattimento processuale.. ad ogni modo spero ti sia utile come buon punto di partenza ;-) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2014-01-20 19:47:51 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/sites/law.unsw.edu.au/files/pre/f... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
conforme alla triade Explanation: ...delle sentenze della Clausola di confronto esperto-prova e della sospensione del procedimento in caso di più procedimenti. Più che trilogia utilizzeri il termine 'triade' dal momento che ci si riferisce ai tre casi (vedi link) come II punto di partenza.. 2° link The Court’s Confrontation Clause trilogy deals with the applicability of the Sixth Amendment in situations in which the government seeks to admit opinions and conclusions of nontestifying experts through affidavits, surrogate witnesses, and testifying experts. In each case, the Court’s analysis began with the purpose of the nontestifying expert’s report. Now, in the opening decades of a new millennium, another expert-evidence trilogy has appeared. This new **trilogy** arises not from a statute but from the Constitution: it relates to the intersection between the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment and the many varieties of forensic science evidence that often provide a mainstay of prosecutors’ cases against criminal defendants. Reference: http://tenthcircuitconference.org/wp-content/uploads/David_K... Reference: http://www.fr.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Frongillo-et-al_Th... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.