commercial speech
Polish translation: wypowiedź komercyjna
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12:51 Nov 21, 2020 |
| English to Polish translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / ECHR case-law - orzecznictwo ETPCz | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Sławomir Małyszek Germany Local time: 14:20 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 +2 | wypowiedź komercyjna |
| ||
| 3 | mowa komercyjna |
| ||
| 3 | wypowiedzi o charakterze handlowym |
|
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), Final Judgement, Akdeniz v. Turkey, 20877/10 |
|
| Discussion entries: 3 | |
|---|---|
Answers
20 mins confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +2
peer agreement (net): +2wypowiedź komercyjna Explanation: Takie tłumaczenie wydaje się być utrwalone w języku polskim, zgodnie m.in. z przykłądami poniżej. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 22 mins (2020-11-21 13:14:15 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- W tym pierwszym artykule widzę jeszcze wariant: "wypowiedź handlowa" (przypis 18). Reference: http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Kwartalnik_Prawa_Publiczn... https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/artykuly/europejskie-standardy-dotyczace-swobody-wypowiedzi-komercyjnej-151111326 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grading comment
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 mins confidence:
6 hrs confidence:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 hrs |
| Reference: European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), Final Judgement, Akdeniz v. Turkey, 20877/10 Reference information: (1) Last.fm was blocked by Turkish courts at the request of a local group representing rights holders. It was challenged by the applicant simply as a user of the site, without involvement by last.fm or local ISPs. He was denied standing by Turkish courts. (2) The Second Section ECHR found that the applicant could not claim to be a victim of an Article 10 violation. Two main arguments were put forward to sustain the inadmissibility decision: (a) the content was available to the applicant through other means and was not ‘of special interest’ to the applicant (cf. Khurshid Mustafa case where Iraqi family was prevented by landlord from installing a satellite dish to receive Arabic channels not available otherwise) (para. 25); (b) the case did not raise an important question of general interest – i.e. it was not political but commercial speech in whose regulation states enjoy a greater margin of appreciation (para. 28). - https://wilmap.law.stanford.edu/entries/european-court-human... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations
Your current localization setting
English
Select a language
Close search