no order as to costs save for detailed assessment of the applicant's costs
Slovak translation: žiaden rozkaz vo veci nákladov okrem podrobného zhodnotenia nákladov navrhovateľa
| 14:04 Mar 27, 2013 |
| English to Slovak translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Final court order | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Juro Sebestyen, A.B.I.E.S. s.r.o. Slovakia Local time: 19:54 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No order as to costs save for a detailed assessment of the wife's publicy funded costs. |
| ||
| Detailed assesment |
|
| Discussion entries: 14 | |
|---|---|
Answers
4 hrs confidence: 
žiadny príkaz na náhradu trov súdneho konania okrem náhrady podrobne vyčíslených trov... Explanation: vzniknutých navrhovateľovi. Môj návrh po Stewartovom príspevku v diskusii. To "žiadny príkaz" sa asi dá preložiť aj inak/krajsie, záleží na vete, ktorá tým bodom predchadza. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
13 days confidence:
súdne nariadenie neobsahuje žiadne rozhodnutie o súdnych trovách, ale nariaďuje podrobné posúdenie Explanation: nákladov navrhovateľa ešte raz vcelku (Toto) Súdne nariadenie neobsahuje žiadne rozhodnutie o súdnych trovách, ale nariaďuje podrobné posúdenie nákladov navrhovateľa. alebo možno Súčasťou tohto súdneho nariadenia nie je žiadne rozhodnutie o súdnych trovách, ale nariaďuje podrobné posúdenie nákladov navrhovateľa. Ako sama naznačujete v diskusii, táto anglická veta nevyjadruje nič o tom, kto má alebo nemá platiť, respektíve koľko by mal platiť alebo ako - lebo to všetko asi bude zhodnotené neskôr, keď budú posúdené náklady. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
27 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1žiaden rozkaz vo veci nákladov okrem podrobného zhodnotenia nákladov navrhovateľa Explanation: Bohužiaľ ste neuviedli celú vetu, preto prekladám čo najpresnejšie len Vaše zadanie "no order as to costs save for detailed assessment of the applicant's costs". Nerád by som špekuloval nad inou interpretáciou, lebo nepoznáme šírší kontext a táto interpretácia je najprsnejšia -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 166 days (2013-09-10 07:48:09 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- Dakujem Zola |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Reference comments
27 mins |
| Reference: No order as to costs save for a detailed assessment of the wife's publicy funded costs. Reference information: "This means that there is no order for costs to be recovered from the other side but the court is making an order that there be a detailed assessment carried out by the court if this is applicable. A detailed assessment is where the solicitor prepares, unsurprisingly, a detailed bill of costs showing all work that has been carried out under the terms of the public funding certificate." Reference: http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/Divorce-Advice/Legal-Aid/23... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
3 hrs peer agreement (net): +1 |
| Reference: Detailed assesment Reference information: Detailed assessment For more complex cases a process, formerly called a taxation of costs, now known as detailed assessment, is used. It is unrelated to "tax" in the sense of a method of raising government revenue. The successful party must file with the court a detailed breakdown of the costs and disbursements incurred, known as a bill of costs which sets out the successful party's claim. The bill is usually prepared by a law costs draftsman, whose skill is often as essential to successful litigation as that of a solicitor or barrister. An officer of the court, Costs Judge or District Judge will then assess the reasonableness of the costs with reference to a statutory schedule of limits of entitlements of costs, together with legal precedents, unless the costs can be agreed between the parties. The level of reduction can mean that the bill is reduced in some instances substantially, but in most cases at least 80% of the costs originally sought will be allowed. A court order for costs is enforceable as a debt against the unsuccessful party.[14] Either party can appeal against a detailed assessment, to a Costs Judge or District Judge of the High Court if the assessment was made by a court officer, or by the usual routes of appeal if the assessment was made by a judge. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costs_%28English_law%29#Detaile... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations