Nov 1, 2012 00:09
11 yrs ago
English term
United States
Translator, transcriber, proofreader
Native in: German 
Works in: English to German, German to English
... lead for r < k < r + Q to
English
Science
Computers: Systems, Networks
informatics
Complete phrase:
"Substitution of the product form (4.2.3.23) in the equations (4.2.3.21) and (4.2.3.22) and cancellation of (k) lead for r < k < r + Q to
g(x; y)(1(1 x) + 2(1 y) + )"
Shouldn't it be rather: "... for r< k < r + Q lead to .."
or is this how mathematicians communicate?
"Substitution of the product form (4.2.3.23) in the equations (4.2.3.21) and (4.2.3.22) and cancellation of (k) lead for r < k < r + Q to
g(x; y)(1(1 x) + 2(1 y) + )"
Shouldn't it be rather: "... for r< k < r + Q lead to .."
or is this how mathematicians communicate?
Responses
| 5 +1 | It is correct |
Terry Richards
|
Responses
+1
6 hrs
Terry Richards
France
France
Native in English
&
English
Specializes in field
France
30 years in IT, Engineering degree.
Native in: English (Variants: British, UK, US)
Works in: French to English, English
Related KudoZ points
:
4
Selected
It is correct
the "to" is at the end of this phrase.
the "for" clause says that the bit at the end is only true if the condition "r < k < r+Q" is satisfied.
the "for" clause says that the bit at the end is only true if the condition "r < k < r+Q" is satisfied.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you!"
Discussion
You could also move the entire for clause to the end "lead to g(x;y)... for r < k < r + Q".
All 3 are equally valid.