19:56 Nov 5, 2003 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: NGK United States Local time: 21:04 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +10 | no one party owns the witness |
| ||
4 +5 | Paige has to answer to the defense and the prosecution |
|
no one party owns the witness Explanation: The assertion, ‘There is no property in a witness’, is usually taken to mean that either party to an action may take a statement from a witness and adduce it in evidence or may call the witness to give evidence in court. Reference: http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/ewire/itemtext.cfm?ewid=11 |
| |
Grading comment
| ||