GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
13:34 May 18, 2016 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Court Decision | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Yvonne Gallagher Ireland Local time: 14:28 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +5 | solicitor's initials? |
|
solicitor's initials? Explanation: this case? https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/5174/index... E.P. Adolphe, Q.C., for the respondent. [Page 154] Solicitor for the respondent: E.P. Adolphe, Calgary. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2016-05-18 14:59:51 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- having seen Helena's link and looking at this again I now think it means John Doe, Q.C., Solicitor for the Respondent, E.P. with "E.P" being the RESPONDENT'S initials -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2016-05-18 15:03:16 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- You should be able to work out from your context which person's initials these are... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||