12:43 Nov 18, 2008 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Bus/Financial - Law: Taxation & Customs | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: David Russi United States Local time: 22:05 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +6 | special relationship |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
\"special relation\" or \"special relationship\"? special relationship Explanation: I would also suggest this change: f there is a special relation >> if a special relationship exists This does not read right: is not arm’s length > AT arm’s length ?? -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 26 mins (2008-11-18 13:10:25 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Right, you need the preposition "at" (I have no way of knowing whether this terminology is correct, I'm simply commenting on the structure) |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||