08:03 Aug 17, 2009 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Social Sciences - Philosophy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Jim Tucker (X) United States | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +4 | (missionAries) |
| ||
4 +1 | introduced by missioneries, mass media and travel |
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
introduced by missioneries, mass media and travel Explanation: I think "both" refers to coffee and alcohol. As I am less sure about you last question I will think it over and make a discussion comment on it. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 32 mins (2009-08-17 08:36:38 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I stand corrected on the "both". Bidaa and Jim are correct in identifying the reference as values and paradoxes. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(missionAries) Explanation: points to both 1)continued patriarchal values and 2)hegemonic paradoxes "ushered in by" = "brought on by"; "caused by" -- travel is a force for change, as are missionaries and mass media Here "hegemonic paradoxes" indicates non-puritanical byproducts -- "pubs and clubs" -- brought on by the easy access to the region made possible by missionaries (the first wave), then travel and mass media (subsequent waves). -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2009-08-17 09:48:16 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Hegemonic paradoxes: paradoxical situations brought about by the imposition of culture in an alien environment through power. In this case, the hegemonic (imposing) power is originally a Puritan one (i.e. American), but the dynamics of this situation result in the establishment of non-puritan institutions like pubs and clubs. That is the paradox. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||