GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
08:25 May 30, 2012 |
French to English translations [PRO] Science - Physics / Definition of stimulated emission | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Bertrand Leduc United Kingdom Local time: 00:47 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +7 | and this is the hypothesis that needs to be tested |
| ||
4 +4 | and this is the theory that needs to be tested |
| ||
3 | involves hypothesis testing |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spontaneous & Stimulated emission |
|
Discussion entries: 6 | |
---|---|
and this is the theory that needs to be tested Explanation: Well, unless I'm missing something, that seems to be the idea, and I don't see why it doesn't fit in your context? The first idea is well known and has been provien, while the second is only a theory, and more testing needs to be done on this. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 30 mins (2012-05-30 08:55:32 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Or of course 'assumption' as Chris quite rightly says. From the rest of the text, it does indeed seem to be the case that this latter notion has yet to be fully proven... |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||