nicht visiert

07:10 Sep 5, 2019 

Had we had more information at the very beginning, all these discussions might have been mundane. Based on the question, not signed off is the term used in CH. I meanwhile agree that "not confirmed" may work based on the discussion.

06:29 Sep 5, 2019 

Based on the mixture of descriptions in this Discussion, I wondered whether "Not confirmed" or "Not approved" might work as a translation. They could be consistent with there being a problem with the transaction. Yet they might still work (esp. "Not confirmed") for a transaction that did go through after all.
But I found no convincing evidence for either one after a quick search.

Presumably etymologically linked to "visé": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/visé#Verb

06:21 Sep 5, 2019 

"I was unaware of the fact that Swiss terminology is used in South Africa."
I have not seen anybody make a claim that Swiss terminology is used in South Africa. But I hope that we can allow consideration of suggestions from translators located in any country.

23:30 Sep 4, 2019 

DeepL.com says "unaudited."

14:14 Sep 4, 2019 

It's a transfer from one company's current account to the current account of another related company, and both accounts are at the same bank in Switzerland. This is part of a litigation case. I think I cannot send you a copy, even if it's redacted. No one has claimed that the transfer didn't go through. It's not even an issue. The transfer sheet is in the bank statement documents of the transferring company. It is stamped "Gebucht" with a date. The title of the document is Kontouebertrag. It is on bank letterhead. It states the balance of the transferring and the receiving accounts. There are sufficient funds listed in the transferring account for the transfer.

15:14 Sep 2, 2019 

It does not sound right. The transfers I copied were made on a Saturday and you can see it says vollvisiert. They were executed today.
a) if a translation order, ask your client
b) if for your private information, did you use a CH account for a transfer? If so, you can write to me privately and give me the name of the CH bank
c) if not, country of origin of the transfer? Recipient in which country?
Here a text in which nicht visiert occurs www.treuhandvision.ch › documents › Kreditoren

Should this be correct, than it is not a simple transfer but a much more complicated action, only you can know as you have the full text

14:54 Sep 2, 2019 

I do not question what you see on your screen. I’m concerned about the documents in front of me. Your original translation of not accepted, meaning the transfer won’t be carried out does not seem to be correct, as I believe these transfers wrre carried out. However, it could mean that the transfer has not yet been executed, for instance if the order was placed on a non-banking day. So, the order may be received on a weekend, but will be executed on the next business day. How does that sound?

06:37 Aug 30, 2019 

whatever you might not have seen, short of sending you a screenshot of transfers I made, I can assure you that this appears on the screen

20:31 Aug 29, 2019 

Among the documents in my set, I have also seen "Status: unvisiert" in addition to " nicht visiert." However, I have never seen "vollvisiert" or anything else in that field.

15:55 Aug 29, 2019 

I do not care what Langenscheidt says, but I see what my Swiss bank says. After all, I do not have to rely on a dico. So you have a CH bank account at all? I hope not, might not be legal.

15:53 Aug 29, 2019 

when you make a transfer (by computer logged in in your CH bank account), the first thing you see is "vollvisiert". As soon as the transfer is made, it says "ausgeführt". I do that practically every day. "Nicht visiert" means that a) you do not have enough money on your account, b) there is s.th. wrong with the bank account of the recipient or with number on the pink slip that accompanies invoices or b) s.th. else is wrong. When e.g. you pay today, but mark the payment for transfer a week later, then it says "vollvisiert". I hope that clarifies matters.