GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
13:06 Sep 13, 2006 |
Japanese to English translations [Non-PRO] Tech/Engineering - IT (Information Technology) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: KathyT Australia Local time: 17:59 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 +3 | Standard recording |
|
Standard recording Explanation: These would usually be something like: "Standard quality recording" - "Long play (or Extended) recording" "high quality (or FINE) recording" ...where the user can select to record either better quality images (but fewer minutes recording time per disc) or mediocre quality, grainy images (but significantly more recording time per disc). - - - - - - - - - Plextor ConvertX produced good color but not so very exciting sound. As expected it produced very soft image quality. High and ***Standard quality*** mode based recordings were good, but 180 min Long Play showed very noticeable degradation in image quality. You could see pixels and artifacts whenever video image moved faster. 240 min Extended Play produced very annoying artifacts that were very bothersome for large screen TV. It may be acceptable for iPod and for those with small screen TVs, but for those viewing large screen high definition TVs, it will become very unpleasant to continue to watch. from http://tinyurl.com/hk3uy |
| |