12:12 Aug 21, 2016 |
Polish to English translations [PRO] Philosophy / metoda dedukcyjna i indukcyjna | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: geopiet | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | basis of the deduction and deductive/logicalconsequence |
| ||
2 | premises and conclusions, top-down reasoning |
| ||
1 | cause and effect |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
premises and conclusions, top-down reasoning Explanation: Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning is reasoning where true premises develop a true and valid conclusion. In the case of deductive reasoning, the conclusion must be true if the premises are also true. Deductive reasoning uses general principles to create a specific conclusion. Deductive reasoning is also known as 'top-down reasoning' because it goes from general and works its way down more specific. - http://study.com/academy/lesson/inductive-and-deductive-reas... |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
cause and effect Explanation: . -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 54 mins (2016-08-21 13:06:16 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- znalazłem coś, aby sam się ze sobą nie zgodzić :) ---- Inductive reasoning is reasoning where the premises support the conclusion. The conclusion is the hypothesis, or probable. This means that the conclusion is the part of reasoning that inductive reasoning is trying to prove. Inductive reasoning is also referred to as 'cause and effect reasoning' or 'bottom-up reasoning' because it seeks to prove a conclusion first. This is usually derived from specific instances to develop a general conclusion. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
basis of the deduction and deductive/logicalconsequence Explanation: Zdanie „A” jest racją zdania „B”, zaś zdanie „B” jest następstwem zdania „A”, wtedy i tylko wtedy, gdy prawdziwość zdania „A” jest gwarancją prawdziwości zdania „B”. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racja ccccc According to the deductive-theoretic conception of logical consequence, a sentence X is a logical consequence of a set K of sentences if and only if X is a deductive consequence of K, that is, X is deducible from K. X is deducible from K just in case there is an actual or possible deduction of X from K. In such a case, we say that X may be correctly inferred from K or that it would be correct to conclude X from K. A deduction is associated with a pair ; the set K of sentences is the basis of the deduction, and X is the conclusion. http://www.iep.utm.edu/logcon-d/ |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.