16:16 Jan 26, 2019 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Medical - Medical: Cardiology / Clinical record | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: María Patricia Arce Argentina Local time: 08:55 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | to delay surgery |
| ||
3 | second phase |
|
Discussion entries: 8 | |
---|---|
to delay surgery Explanation: The decision is about the timing to perform CABG surgery. In this case, the surgical team decided to delay surgery, (as opposed to "early surgery"), that is, within the first day/s of admission. Ref. Following PCI of the culprit lesion, stabilised NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel CAD may be discussed within the Heart Team if delayed CABG of the non-culprit vessels is an option. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/37/3/267/2466099 Thus, delaying CABG routinely after NSTEMI might increase resource use without improving outcomes https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82159110.pdf |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
second phase Explanation: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187972961... by S Talfer - 2010 - Cited by 13 - Related articles Nine stage IV tumors were operated in two phases. The second surgical phase took place a mean 6 months after the first phase (range, 77 days to 17 months) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 23 hrs (2019-01-27 15:59:46 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- http://www.cii.org.ar/noticias/Indicaciones actuales de la c... |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.