GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23:05 Apr 13, 2020 |
Swedish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / Patent infringement decision | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Adrian MM. Austria | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | wrongly granted interim injunctions with a penal notice /backed by a fine for non-compliance |
|
wrongly granted interim injunctions with a penal notice /backed by a fine for non-compliance Explanation: Strict liability is 'strictly' OK for no-fault as opposed to absolute liability with nom defenc/ses available at all. Also, interim used to different from interlocutory in England & Wales, namely interim as stand-alone and even permanent vs. interloc, as pre-trial and temporary only. Note that an injunction in Anglo-Am. law can be either prohibitive > restraining or mandatory > must-do, as a positive order to do something. cf. an Anton_Piller_order, now known in the UK as a search & seize order e.g. of patent-etc. infringing goods. Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://www.proz.com/kudoz/swedish-to-english/law-patents/696... Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Piller_order |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.