Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
counter petitioner
Serbo-Croat translation:
protivtužilac
Added to glossary by
Kristina Kolic
Aug 14, 2009 16:21
14 yrs ago
8 viewers *
English term
counter petitioner
English to Serbo-Croat
Law/Patents
Law (general)
law
Ovo je tužena strana. Naziva se respondent/counter petitioner. To je strana koja je podnela Protiv tužbu za razvod braka. Kako da sve ovo prevedem da bi bilo saglasno našim brakorazvodnim parnicama.
Proposed translations
(Serbo-Croat)
3 +3 | protivtuzilac | Anira |
5 | podnosilac protivtužbe/protivzahteva za razvod braka | Milan Djukić |
4 | predlagač u protivzahtjevu | John Farebrother |
Change log
Jan 5, 2010 15:33: Kristina Kolic changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/91633">zoe1's</a> old entry - "counter petitioner"" to ""protivtuzilac""
Proposed translations
+3
3 hrs
Selected
protivtuzilac
Onda bi "respondent/counter petitioner" bilo "tuzeni/protivtuzilac".
Navodim isti link kao za prethodni odgovor.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2009-08-15 06:45:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Evo jos nekoliko primjera:
"ОДБИЈА СЕ као неоснована ревизија тужених – противтужилаца изјављена против пресуде..."
"Благовременом и дозвољеном ревизијом тужени противтужилац побија ..."
Navodim isti link kao za prethodni odgovor.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2009-08-15 06:45:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Evo jos nekoliko primjera:
"ОДБИЈА СЕ као неоснована ревизија тужених – противтужилаца изјављена против пресуде..."
"Благовременом и дозвољеном ревизијом тужени противтужилац побија ..."
Note from asker:
Hvala! |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Hvala!"
4 mins
predlagač u protivzahtjevu
mislim da bi trebalo biti to
Note from asker:
Hvala! |
3 hrs
podnosilac protivtužbe/protivzahteva za razvod braka
Kao i za vaše prethodno pitanje:
Once a party has been served with the Original Petition for Divorce, the receiving party must answer the petition. It is important to understand that a divorce is actually a lawsuit whereby one spouse is suing the other spouse for a divorce and for assets. When answering the lawsuit for divorce, the answering party has several options. One option is to simply to file a general denial. A general denial simply means that the answering party disagrees with what the filing party has asserted in their petition and they generally deny the allegation without getting into specifics. A general denial is by far the most common form of answer filed today. If the answering party wants to go one step forward, he or she can file a counter petition for divorce. A counter petition for divorce is simply the answering party filing what amounts to a counter claim against the filing party. There answering party can file the same types of counter claims against the filing party. By way of clarification, the person who first files the divorce is called the Petitioner and the person answering is called the Respondent. When a counter claim is introduced, the person who originally filed the divorce is called the Petitioner and Counter Respondent and the answering party is called the Respondent and Counter Petitioner. The effect of filing a counter petition is that neither party can drop the lawsuit without both parties acquiescing. Additionally, the Respondents and Counter Petitioner's claims are now allowed to be heard by the Court. It is important to understand that unless issues are directly pled in the Petition or Counter Petition, the Court does not have to hear the issues.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2009-08-14 20:14:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/english_to_serbian/law_general/339...
Once a party has been served with the Original Petition for Divorce, the receiving party must answer the petition. It is important to understand that a divorce is actually a lawsuit whereby one spouse is suing the other spouse for a divorce and for assets. When answering the lawsuit for divorce, the answering party has several options. One option is to simply to file a general denial. A general denial simply means that the answering party disagrees with what the filing party has asserted in their petition and they generally deny the allegation without getting into specifics. A general denial is by far the most common form of answer filed today. If the answering party wants to go one step forward, he or she can file a counter petition for divorce. A counter petition for divorce is simply the answering party filing what amounts to a counter claim against the filing party. There answering party can file the same types of counter claims against the filing party. By way of clarification, the person who first files the divorce is called the Petitioner and the person answering is called the Respondent. When a counter claim is introduced, the person who originally filed the divorce is called the Petitioner and Counter Respondent and the answering party is called the Respondent and Counter Petitioner. The effect of filing a counter petition is that neither party can drop the lawsuit without both parties acquiescing. Additionally, the Respondents and Counter Petitioner's claims are now allowed to be heard by the Court. It is important to understand that unless issues are directly pled in the Petition or Counter Petition, the Court does not have to hear the issues.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2009-08-14 20:14:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/english_to_serbian/law_general/339...
Note from asker:
Hvala! |
Something went wrong...