Kirsten Bodart Apr 28, 2011:

I think that is right. The sentence essentially asks the court to dismiss the case in so far that it may be valid in the eyes of the same court. If they are later still going to argue that some of those facts related to the case are not valid to the court, or they have already argued that, then it is, in legal terms, logical that they would say this. If the case, or complaint as they call it, is not valid it cannot be dismissed. Hence, they explicitly state that it may not be valid, otherwise they would be contradicting themselves.

Horst Huber (X) Apr 27, 2011:

Does it not seek to suggest that there are complaints that do not rise to the level of being accepted or dismissed?

AllegroTrans Apr 27, 2011:

Legally speaking it adds absolutely nothing to the preceding part of the sentence

Horst Huber (X) Apr 27, 2011:

Non-legally speaking, I would think, if it can be entertained by the court. I don't know if this is a matter of standing or of the validity of the complaint.