Oct 8, 2012 11:15
11 yrs ago
Romanian term
raport de apariţie
Romanian to English
Other
Philosophy
Raportul de apariţie se structurează pe fondul percepţiei şi al apercepţiei, şi constă în faptul de a permite să apară un conţinut spiritual în materia sensibilă. Conţinutul spiritual şi materia sensibilă constituie cele două planuri ale obiectului estetic. Nici unul din planuri nu poate exista fără celălalt în obiectul estetic
„frumuseţea stă în raportul de apariţie, aşadar nici în planul real din faţă, nici în cel ireal dinapoi, ci numai în apariţia celui din urmă în cel dintâi” (Nicolai Hartman)
Am o vaga idee, însă aş avea nevoie de o confirmare, sau de o idee mai buna. Mulţumesc!
„frumuseţea stă în raportul de apariţie, aşadar nici în planul real din faţă, nici în cel ireal dinapoi, ci numai în apariţia celui din urmă în cel dintâi” (Nicolai Hartman)
Am o vaga idee, însă aş avea nevoie de o confirmare, sau de o idee mai buna. Mulţumesc!
Proposed translations
(English)
3 | relationship of manifestation | Ioana Costache |
2 | occurrence report | Alexandranow |
2 | forthcoming percentage/degree | Catalin Oprea |
References
citatul din Hartmann | Cristina Crişan |
Proposed translations
6 hrs
Selected
relationship of manifestation
Unwieldy as the phrase is, this seems to be it.
"Hartmann distinguishes two levels in the aesthetic object, which he calls the foreground level and the background level. The foreground level comprises the real, concrete and sensible dimensions of the object, everything that is independent of the presence of a subject who addresses the object and seeks to understand it. The background levels vary with the kinds of content the foreground level lets appear. The background level exists only for the subject who grasps it. This level is typically organized into many distinct sub-levels. Following Hartmann, we may therefore state that “according to its manner of being, the artistic object necessarily has two levels” (those of foreground and background), while “according to the overall structure of its content—that is to say, according to its inner form (i.e. the background level)—it has many levels” (AE; Poli 1998). A theory of this kind obviously has two critical points: first, the problem of how the relationship between the two levels is articulated; second, the problem of how the relationship among the sublevels of the background level is articulated. In the former case, Hartmann talks of a “relationship of manifestation” on the basis of which—as has been pointed out on innumerable occasions— the foreground (i.e. the matter of the object) imposes constraints on the background."
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2012-10-08 17:34:48 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Glad to be of help :)
"Hartmann distinguishes two levels in the aesthetic object, which he calls the foreground level and the background level. The foreground level comprises the real, concrete and sensible dimensions of the object, everything that is independent of the presence of a subject who addresses the object and seeks to understand it. The background levels vary with the kinds of content the foreground level lets appear. The background level exists only for the subject who grasps it. This level is typically organized into many distinct sub-levels. Following Hartmann, we may therefore state that “according to its manner of being, the artistic object necessarily has two levels” (those of foreground and background), while “according to the overall structure of its content—that is to say, according to its inner form (i.e. the background level)—it has many levels” (AE; Poli 1998). A theory of this kind obviously has two critical points: first, the problem of how the relationship between the two levels is articulated; second, the problem of how the relationship among the sublevels of the background level is articulated. In the former case, Hartmann talks of a “relationship of manifestation” on the basis of which—as has been pointed out on innumerable occasions— the foreground (i.e. the matter of the object) imposes constraints on the background."
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2012-10-08 17:34:48 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Glad to be of help :)
Note from asker:
Mulţumesc, Ioana, exact asta aşteptam :) |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Mulţumesc, Ioana!"
4 hrs
occurrence report
occurence-apariție
Note from asker:
Mulţumesc, Alexandranow, dar mă tem că e puţin mai complicat :) |
6 hrs
forthcoming percentage/degree
alte posibilitati ar fi emergence degree/extent etc.
Note from asker:
Mulţumesc, Cătălin! |
Reference comments
8 hrs
Reference:
citatul din Hartmann
V. nota 30.
Note from asker:
Mulţumesc! |
Something went wrong...