English term
is capable of
4 +4 | "is able to" would be better | Jack Doughty |
4 | that manages to | Patricia ONeill |
4 | omit it! | B D Finch |
Oct 16, 2013 05:27: Edith Kelly changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Non-PRO (3): Tony M, Trudy Peters, Edith Kelly
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
"is able to" would be better
that manages to
would be another option
omit it!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2013-10-16 09:07:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
... is capable of / able to / can etc. all introduce uncertainty; i.e. the text is able to communicate a clear and concrete message, but might fail to do so. It is also a weak statement.
Something went wrong...