Dec 9, 2013 22:46
10 yrs ago
27 viewers *
Romanian term
United Kingdom
Accurate - Fluent - Professional
Native in: Romanian
Works in: English to Romanian, Romanian to English, French to English, and 1 more.
sentinta recurata
Romanian to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Court Procedures
Fragment din decizia emisa de o instanta:
"Instanta admite recursul declarat de condamnatul persoana transferabila XXX impotriva sentintei penale nr. xxx fin [data] a Curtii de Apel Bucuresti - Sectia 1-a Penala.
Caseaza, in parte, sentinta recurata si rejudecand:"
Cu mii de multumiri anticipate
"Instanta admite recursul declarat de condamnatul persoana transferabila XXX impotriva sentintei penale nr. xxx fin [data] a Curtii de Apel Bucuresti - Sectia 1-a Penala.
Caseaza, in parte, sentinta recurata si rejudecand:"
Cu mii de multumiri anticipate
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | ruling/verdict/sentence/decision under appeal |
Claudia Coja
|
| 3 | (BrE crim. & civ.) judgment on appeal |
Adrian MM. (X)
|
Change log
Dec 10, 2013 09:15: Lucica Abil (X) changed "Language pair" from "English to Romanian" to "Romanian to English"
Proposed translations
+2
12 mins
Claudia Coja
Native in Romanian
Specializes in field
Your Certified Legal Translator
Native in: Romanian (Variant: Romania) 
Works in: English to Romanian, Romanian to English, German to Romanian, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
230
Selected
ruling/verdict/sentence/decision under appeal
sau "appealed ruling/verdict/sentence/decision" - in functie de cum ati tradus "sentinta" ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 minute (2013-12-09 23:04:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Rezumatul hotărârii recurate
Summary of the judgment under appeal
10. La punctul 31 din hotărârea recurată, Tribunalul a hotărât că primul punct, privind încălcarea dreptului la apărare al Groupe Gascogne și a prezumției de nevinovăție, conținea elemente noi și era, prin urmare, inadmisibil.
10. In paragraph 31 of the judgment under appeal the General Court held that the first point, concerning a breach of Groupe Gascogne’s rights of defence and the presumption of innocence, comprised new elements and was therefore inadmissible.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=ro&ihmlang=...
Prin Hotărârea din 21 septembrie 2005, Kadi/Consiliul și Comisia (T‑315/01) (denumită în continuare „hotărârea recurată”)(10), Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a menținut regulamentul atacat și a respins toate motivele invocate de recurent.
By judgment of 21 September 2005 in Case T-315/01 Kadi v Council and Commission (‘the judgment under appeal’), (10) the Court of First Instance upheld the contested regulation and rejected all of the appellant’s pleas. On 17 November 2005, the appellant brought the present appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&ihmlang=...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 minute (2013-12-09 23:04:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Rezumatul hotărârii recurate
Summary of the judgment under appeal
10. La punctul 31 din hotărârea recurată, Tribunalul a hotărât că primul punct, privind încălcarea dreptului la apărare al Groupe Gascogne și a prezumției de nevinovăție, conținea elemente noi și era, prin urmare, inadmisibil.
10. In paragraph 31 of the judgment under appeal the General Court held that the first point, concerning a breach of Groupe Gascogne’s rights of defence and the presumption of innocence, comprised new elements and was therefore inadmissible.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=ro&ihmlang=...
Prin Hotărârea din 21 septembrie 2005, Kadi/Consiliul și Comisia (T‑315/01) (denumită în continuare „hotărârea recurată”)(10), Tribunalul de Primă Instanță a menținut regulamentul atacat și a respins toate motivele invocate de recurent.
By judgment of 21 September 2005 in Case T-315/01 Kadi v Council and Commission (‘the judgment under appeal’), (10) the Court of First Instance upheld the contested regulation and rejected all of the appellant’s pleas. On 17 November 2005, the appellant brought the present appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&ihmlang=...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
1 day 22 hrs
(BrE crim. & civ.) judgment on appeal
(BrE) judgment appealed against.
Appealed judgment is more AmE, as is vacated (quashed, overturned or set aside in BrE.)
Appealed judgment is more AmE, as is vacated (quashed, overturned or set aside in BrE.)
Discussion