Polish term
umocowywać (zasadę)
3 +1 | the doctrine of stare decisis | Adrian MM. |
2 | (come to) stand for (a principle) | mike23 |
Proposed translations
the doctrine of stare decisis
'several answers to two basic questions'.. also raises the allied concept of res judicata aka in Anglo-Am. law: single-issue estoppel vs. cause-of-action estoppel.
Stare decisis, which is Latin for "to stand by things decided," is a judicial doctrine under which a court follows the principles, rules, or standards of its prior decisions or decisions of higher tribunals when deciding a case with arguably similar facts
Precedent is a legal principle or rule that is created by a court decision. This decision becomes an example, or authority, for judges deciding similar issues. Stare decisis is the doctrine that obliges courts to look to precedent when making decisions.
agree |
Jacek Rogala (X)
: I'd agree with this interesting answer!
15 hrs
|
dziękuję bardzo!
|
(come to) stand for (a principle)
come to stand for the principle of...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 2 hrs (2021-06-12 16:40:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The case has come to stand for the principle of judicial review, because it was the first case under the United States Constitution where the Supreme Court ...
https://books.google.pl/books?id=5DJlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA250&lpg=P...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 3 hrs (2021-06-12 16:47:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The court cases cited as precedents stand for the principle that the power of Congress to provide for the payment of debts...
https://books.google.pl/books?id=NtdFAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA117&lpg=P...
Relatedly, Burrow-Giles would seem to stand for the principle that, unlike the differentiable layers of an onion, in many instances there simply are no micro-authored subparts of the whole to which copyright attaches.
https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/lawandarts/a...
The cases do not stand for the principle that Courts may not consider statements by govern-ment officials...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-965/40218/20180...
Discussion