GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
21:51 Oct 25, 2006 |
Italian to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Journalism / Press summary of local news | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Umberto Cassano Italy Local time: 02:56 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +7 | populistic and individualistic trends |
| ||
3 +1 | solitary drift into populism |
|
populistic and individualistic trends Explanation: A suggestion... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 19 mins (2006-10-25 22:10:45 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Anche ***POPULIST AND INDIVIDUALISTIC TRENDS*** "But he quickly goes astray when he begins to argue that modern conservatism united two radically different and perhaps incompatible strands of thought, one "traditionalist and authoritarian", the other ***populist and individualistic***. He argues that it was only possible to fuse these two ideologies because : "a third strand of conservatism, the angry anti-communism of the 1950s, overlapped the traditionalist-authoritarian and the libertarian-capitalist kinds of conservatism." There's nothing revolutionary about this analysis. It is well understood that there are some points where pure libertarianism must come into some degree of conflict with a more religiously based conservatism. But what Hodgson fails to comprehend, as do most like-minded critics, is that most of these conflicts are really a function of the same unique set of circumstances that produced the anti-communist era also. Hodgson accurately describes the compromise that America arrived at in the second half of the twentieth century as conservatives not challenging the rise of the social-welfare state in exchange for liberals supporting the military-industrial conflict." http://www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.det... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 30 mins (2006-10-25 22:21:40 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Credo che l'espressione possa anche essere resa con ***POPULIST AND PERSONALIST TRENDS" One consequence of this process was the rise of non-mainstream political movements and leaders. Le Pen, Villiers, and Tapie owe their success to the unpopularity of traditional politics and politicians and to their own effective use of television to support an antisystem, ***populist and personalist message***, of either the left or right. Legislative elections in April 1993 may have prevented a reenactment of May 1968; they provided catharsis by virtually annihilating the governing Socialists. http://www.ndu.edu/inss/McNair/mcnair49/m49c2.html "W. Wallace "Worrying trends: the demise of political parties" As a result of that decline, ***personalist and populist politics*** are on the rise in all European countries. At the same time, popular participation in elections is falling in each of our countries, most of all in elections for the European Parliament. Another real danger for European democracy is that the split of Europe into a successful and an unsuccessful class can lead to populist revolts by the unsuccessful in all of our countries — expressing itself in the rise of the nationalist Right or the nationalist Left." http://www.koerber-stiftung.de/bg/recherche/pdf_protokoll/bn... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||