16:54 Apr 9, 2009 |
Swedish to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Bjørnar Magnussen Local time: 19:15 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | strength of evidence |
| ||
3 +1 | evidential weight |
| ||
4 | proof required |
| ||
4 | burden of proof |
|
evidential weight Explanation: Some evidence might be admitted to the court (i.e. is legally admissible) but the opposing lawyer might call the evidential weight of it into question. ... www.recordsmanagement.ed.ac.uk/InfoStaff/RMstaff/LegalAdmis... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
proof required Explanation: Hittade olika varianter på Eur-lex, ovanstående samt standard of proof, probative value och evidential force. Take your pick:-) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
strength of evidence Explanation: Best in this context. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
burden of proof Explanation: In the United States, the two burdens of proof customarily used are "beyond a reasonable doubt" (criminal) and "by greater weight of the evidence" (civil). It would be helpful to see the rest of the sentence, since it will likely provide information about the burden of proof that Swedish Tax authorities will apply. Standard of proof is the evidence needed to meet a burden of proof. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.