Jan 19, 2013 02:17
11 yrs ago
Japanese term
方法クレーム
Non-PRO
Japanese to English
Law/Patents
Patents
I am doing a test for a translation agency and I have been asked to draw up a 方法クレーム based on the first claim of a patent I translated.
I know that 方法クレーム translates into English as "method claim" but don't know how my translation should differ from my translation of claim 1.
I know that 方法クレーム translates into English as "method claim" but don't know how my translation should differ from my translation of claim 1.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +1 | process / method claim |
David Gibney
|
| 5 | process claim |
yumom
|
Proposed translations
+1
14 mins
David Gibney
Ireland
Ireland
Native in English
Ireland
Professional, punctual translations
Native in: English 
Works in: Japanese to English, English to Japanese
Related KudoZ points
:
4
Selected
process / method claim
process / method claim
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2013-01-19 02:35:33 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_(patent)
Do you have any further context? Source country? Text?
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 mins (2013-01-19 02:36:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, agency country, target (not source, obviously).
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2013-01-19 02:35:33 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_(patent)
Do you have any further context? Source country? Text?
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 mins (2013-01-19 02:36:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, agency country, target (not source, obviously).
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "thanks"
1 hr
process claim
For example,
Claim 1 states:
A process for producing xxx, characterized in that said process comprises the steps of xxxx.
then,
Claim 2 may state:
A xxx (product) prepared by the process according to Claim 1.
In the case above, the invention as defined in Claim 2 includes the invention of Claim 1, i.e., process claim.
You should understand that the descriptions of claims are not only exaplantions, but to define the scope protection granted by the patent, i.e., to be legally examined.
Please see the reference.
Claim 1 states:
A process for producing xxx, characterized in that said process comprises the steps of xxxx.
then,
Claim 2 may state:
A xxx (product) prepared by the process according to Claim 1.
In the case above, the invention as defined in Claim 2 includes the invention of Claim 1, i.e., process claim.
You should understand that the descriptions of claims are not only exaplantions, but to define the scope protection granted by the patent, i.e., to be legally examined.
Please see the reference.
Reference:
Something went wrong...