No, it doesn't sound right to me. The first thing that must be changed is the preposition. You can't protect someone "towards" something; it has to be "against" or "from". Here "against" is the natural option.

I am also very doubtful about "protection profile". This is actually a technical term in computer security, which is already a reason not to use it here; but apart from this, the structure doesn't really work, I think largely because the issue is protection against something, not a profile against something. I don't think anything important is lost if you simply cut "profile" and say "protection of X against...". If you want to be more specific, you might say "state of protection of X against...".

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2013-09-14 22:39:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Let me develop my comments on "protection profile" a little. In principle this should be acceptable in itself as a way of referring to how someone is protected. However, applying the test you used, searching for instances of the expression, "protection profile of workers/doctors/students" (I haven't tried them all), even without "towards", you just don't find any. There is no law against using a sequence of words that Google can't find on the Internet, but in this case I think it confirms my feeling that "protection profile" is just not a natural way of expressing this idea. You can refer, for example, to the safety profile of something, meaning how safe it is (and in what ways), but "protection profile of X", meaning how and how well X is protected, doesn't work (in my opinion), because "profile" tends to refer to attributes of something.

This is apart from the other point I mentioned: that "protection profile of X against Y" suggests that the profile is against Y, whereas in fact it is the profile of protecton against Y; the conceptual structure has been distorted.

Tony's idea of "protection profile for X against Y" raise a different problem I think: it means, or certainly could mean, a set of recommendations on how X could or should be protected against Y, but as I understand it the subject is how X is in fact protected.

I still think that "protection" alone would provide a suitable title for the content you've described, but if something more really is needed, then apart from "state of protection" you might consider something like"current protective measures for X" (adding "current" would obviate the prescriptive/descriptive confusion).