Anticipated is indeed also used in relation to registered designs as well as patents.

See, e.g.: "Principles of Intellectual Property Law"

Novelty
Comparison with the prior art is made for all types of article, not just the one for which registration is sought. The prior art comprises designs registered or published in the UK before the date of application. A prior publication must be freely available to the public and contain clear and unmistakeable directions to make an article bearing the design. A prior artistic work will not anticipate a design provided that the copyright owner's permission is obtained and the work has not previously been applied. A design is anticipated if the prior art reveals the same design or one differing only in immaterial details or variants common in the trade. Similarity is judged by eye alone and the test allows for imperfect memory of the earlier design.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hI8kN17SrEsC&pg=PA305&lpg...

Even the reference provided by Matthew actually supports this usage of antériorisée (see, e.g. section 50 of the parallel EN and FR texts)

[50] En l’espèce, l’invention revendiquée dans le brevet 777 n’a pas été divulguée dans le brevet 875, de sorte qu’elle n’est pas antériorisée. L’allégation d’antériorité n’est pas fondée.

[50] In the case at bar, the invention of the ‘777 patent was not disclosed by the ‘875 patent and was therefore not anticipated. The allegation of anticipation has not been justified.