présence réelle, simultanée et non interrompue

20:54 Sep 13, 2023 

"insistence on the letter of the law" being somehow a priori unworthy of legal terminology? Wow, I never though of that ...

Avoiding ambiguity when possible being somehow surplus to requirement? Another trick to unlearn for this old dog ...

BTW I never said that you don't "attend" virtual meetings" - the whole problem of "ambiguity" stems from the fact that you CAN "attend" virtual meetings. Compare that with the fact that the ST is ONLY about being present "in person".

15:02 Sep 12, 2023 

Well, are you satisfied now? The asker has closed the question without grading out of embarrassment for what ensued as a result of your and Daryo's actions, i.e, initially more or less agreeing with me with caveats, then downgrading to a disagree after me defending myself by answering your criticisms, which I have every right to do.There were no " below the belt insults", but interesting you think you can behave like this and still expect to do so with impunity, without any comeback whatsoever.

11:25 Sep 12, 2023 

"Despise" my comments (and Daryo's) as much as you like, but please have the courtesy to do so with linguistic reasoning, not below the belt, crude insults. You know well that you already have had several site punishments for this behaviour.

07:55 Sep 12, 2023 

Thank you for all the comments

07:55 Sep 12, 2023 

Thank you for all the comments

00:56 Sep 12, 2023 

It's because I don't believe in the validity of your comments. In fact quite the reverse; I despised your comments. I responded to your initial comments after which you changed your neutral comment to a disagree ,shortly to be joined by Daryo. His assertion that you don't " attend" virtual meetings" is nearly as ludicrous as his pluralising of " way" twice. You both validated AMM's clumsy and incongruous attempt to translate the words when I'm sure any asker with a dictionary could have come up with something better. And all this after the asker's response to my answer: " Thank's, that's absolutely perfect". So, following your exhortation to think about it, I have, and come to the conclusion that it's you two who have come up short, not me. If you could see your way clear to p@ssing on someone else's parade I'd be much obliged, but if this attitude continues I shall ask for a mutual ban to be imposed. Thank you.

20:43 Sep 11, 2023 

"Allegro's insistence on the letter of the law has long been an attempt to cover his own pusillanimity, these comments just further proof. Daryo's comment, like the quality of English used to express them, absolute b@llocks."
Why, when people make valid linguistic criticism of your answers, do you find it necessary to hit back with insults?